Meaning Of ‘The American Dream’ Different For Minorities, Whites

JohnsHopkinsUniversity's picture
Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly versionPDF versionPDF version
April 9, 2014
MEDIA CONTACT: Jill Rosen
Office of Communications
Office: 443-997-9906
Cell: 443-547-8805

Though owning a home is considered the American dream, race can determine how sweet that dream actually is.

In a report published in the new issue of the journal Urban Studies, Johns Hopkins University sociologist Meredith Greif found that while homeownership can spark feelings of pride in people of any race, it’s more meaningful for minorities. But, because blacks and Latinos buy more homes in disadvantaged communities and are less likely to able to move, they ultimately tend to feel dissatisfied with their community — and potentially their purchase.

“Homeownership may be considered a double-edged sword,” Greif said. “For minorities, the highs of homeownership are higher while the lows are lower.”

In a paper called The intersection of homeownership, race and neighborhood context: Implications for neighborhood satisfaction, Greif attempted to determine whether owning a home means different things to blacks, Latinos and whites and whether owning a home can increase the chance of neighborhood dissatisfaction in disadvantaged communities.

Studying homeowners in Los Angeles County through information gathered in 2001 by the Los Angeles Family and Neighborhood Survey and the 2000 Census, she found that whites had significantly higher rates of homeownership than blacks and Latinos. Whites were also most likely to live in “desirable” neighborhoods with greater property values, better services and higher prestige.

However, Greif’s findings suggest that living in these enviable communities may not provoke the same sense of pride and achievement that it does for blacks and Latinos – just as living in disadvantaged communities may not spark the same level of concern.

“Whites have more of an economic buffer,” she said. “There is less at stake for them one way or the other.”

For blacks, owning a home, particularly in a more advantaged community, may evoke feelings of conquering the odds. The feelings are similar among Latinos, many of whom are immigrants looking to assimilate socially and economically.

Black and Latino homeowners, however, are significantly less likely to be able to buy homes in the neighborhoods that would elicit those feelings.

In 2002, the median net worth of white households was 15 times that of black households and 10 times that of Latino households, meaning blacks and Latinos put considerably more of their net worth into buying a home. So when minorities were faced with signs of neighborhood deterioration – graffiti, litter, abandoned buildings — they were much more anxious about the threat to their most vital asset.

Overall, Greif found all homeowners are more attuned to their communities than renters – in both good and bad ways. It can foster stronger neighborhood satisfaction in advantaged communities but undermine it in less advantaged ones.

“These findings speak to the ongoing dialogue surrounding the benefits of homeownership – and for whom,” Greif said.

###

Johns Hopkins University news releases can be found online at http://releases.jhu.edu/. Information on automatic email delivery of science and medical news releases is available at the same address.

April 9, 2014 Tags: homeownership, Johns Hopkins University, Krieger School of Arts and Sciences, Meredith Greif, sociology

Copy this html code to your website/blog to embed this press release.