RELEASE: A User’s Guide to the Fiscal Year 2015 Defense Budget

American Progress's picture
Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly version

Contact: Anne Shoup
Phone: 202.481.7146

Washington, D.C. — Today, just ahead of the National Defense Authorization Act markup next week, the Center for American Progress released a new report that clarifies and extrapolates on the decisions made within the 2015 fiscal year defense budget.

The Pentagon should be commended for making a number of smart choices in its FY 2015 budget request, choices that will enhance our security while adhering to the Budget Control Act of 2011,” said Lawrence J. Korb, Senior Fellow at the Center for American Progress. “However, its program for the FY 2016–2019 period will not meet the challenges of the current national security environment because it incorrectly assumes defense spending will return to the record high levels that characterized the decade after 9/11 and therefore risks triggering another sequester.”

The report explains the U.S. Department of Defense’s FY 2015 budget request and outlines a sound path to responsibly and efficiently meet the risks and challenges of the current national security environment. There are several smart, targeted reforms that will maintain U.S. military capabilities such as a $26 billion Opportunity, Growth and Security Initiative, as well as a base budget request of $496 billion.

The report offers the following recommendations for Congress and the U.S. Department of Defense:

  • Reduce procurement of the littoral combat ship, or LCS, on the front end by nixing one of the variants—the current reduction from 52 to 32 hulls comes outside the Future Years Defense Program, or FYDP—which will free up funds to develop a new small surface combatant with more firepower in line with a frigate.
  • Bring F-35 STOVL procurement down to two airframes per year until the hardware problems and software development are worked out; this echoes the decision made on the F-35C, which faces similar hurdles. The high level of concurrency makes no sense in the absence of an existential threat and the continuing viability of legacy platforms and will increase the need for expensive upgrades and alterations later.
  • Authorize a Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission, or BRAC; there’s simply no excuse for letting parochial concerns block DOD attempts to rationalize its infrastructure to reflect the new force structure.

Read the analysis: A User’s Guide to the Fiscal Year 2015 Defense Budget by Lawrence J. Korb, Max Hoffman, and Kate Blakeley

To speak with experts on this topic, please contact Anne Shoup at or 202.481.7146.


To speak with our experts on this topic, please contact:

Print: Katie Peters (economy, education, poverty, Half in Ten Education Fund)

202.741.6285 or

Print: Anne Shoup (foreign policy and national security, energy, LGBT issues, health care, gun-violence prevention)

202.481.7146 or

Print: Crystal Patterson (immigration)

202.478.6350 or

Print: Madeline Meth (women's issues, Legal Progress, higher education)

202.741.6277 or

Spanish-language and ethnic media: Tanya Arditi

202.741.6258 or

TV: Lindsay Hamilton

202.483.2675 or

Radio: Chelsea Kiene

202.478.5328 or

Copy this html code to your website/blog to embed this press release.


Post new comment

2 + 10 =

To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.
Page execution time was 612.9 ms.

Memory usage:

Memory used at: devel_init()=2.13 MB, devel_shutdown()=22.56 MB.