The Social Security Trustees Say They Must Dip Into Its Trust Fund For The First Time Since 1982

AMAC's picture
Posted Friday, June 15, 2018        

social security administration portal benefits application disability benefits pension COLA benefitAMAC supports a long-term guarantee for future retirees

WASHINGTON, DC, June 15 – For the first time in 36 years, according to the trustees of Social Security and Medicare, they will have to dip into the Trust Fund to meet its obligations.

“Perhaps lawmakers will now take the action necessary, in a timely fashion, to ensure the viability of the retirement and health care programs American workers invest in each payday.  In fact, AMAC has been working with our representatives in Washington urging them to do just that,” says Dan Weber, president of the Association of Mature American Citizens.

Weber is hopeful that a Social Security Guarantee Act will be introduced in the House of Representatives soon.  Such a law would deal with the long-term solvency of the Social Security Trust Fund in several ways.  It would set back the retirement age for new retirees and change the level of payments for future retirees starting in 2022.

The Trustees believe that unless something is done about the issue of solvency, Social Security benefits would have to be reduced starting in 2034.  “As the population ages at a rapid pace – 10,000 of us turn 65 each and every year – retirement is likely to become a pipe dream for many of today’s workers.  We need to make sure that the funding will be there for them when they need it.  But we must do more,” says Weber.

He is strongly committed to an overhaul of the law that would also focus on Cost-of-Living Adjustments (COLA), such issues as the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP), the Retirement Earnings Test penalty and the double taxation of benefits and what AMAC calls Social Security PLUS.

The association describes the Social Security Plus provision as a voluntary early retirement account—a way for those paying into Social Security to have some control of how their money is invested.  That would be accomplished by allowing workers to make contributions into Plus accounts.  To avoid risky investments,

half of the money deposited in their accounts would have to be invested in guaranteed interest products such as government bonds or annuity contracts.  Workers would be free to invest their balances in any other investment that meets certain suitability standards.

“The Guarantee Act needs to address the special needs of poorer Social Security beneficiaries.  We’ve proposed that beneficiaries earning a household income of $20,000 or less receive an automatic annual COLA increase of three to four percent.  Recipients with incomes ranging from $20,000 to $50,000 would receive an increase of 1.5% to 3% maximum.  And, those earning $50,001 or more would collect increases of 1% to 2%.”

Soon after President Trump was elected, Weber met with his transition team to discuss a variety of issues of concern to America’s seniors including Social Security.  “We found that the administration was in sync with our concerns and the importance of a Social Security Guarantee for this generation and for future generations.  Social Security is not an entitlement handout, as many would suggest; it’s an annuity workers pay for all their working lives, a retirement fund that is supposed to be backed by the full faith and credit of the United States.  But the government now says it may not have enough money to sustain the program and that benefits may be cut in the future and that’s unacceptable.”

Related Articles

  • China vitamins medicine medications pain relief lower prices Trump

    China Manufacturing of Most US Medicine and Vitamins Poses Security Threat, Researchers Say

    As Chinese companies have begun taking control of the pharmaceutical...

  • national debt security

    The Threat to National Security That Hardly Anyone Is Watching

    When I was elected in 2016, the national debt was nearing $20 trillion....

  • social security administration portal benefits application disability benefits pension COLA benefit

    Overpayment Notice Due to Ex-spouse Benefits – Ask Rusty

    Dear Rusty:  My husband got an overpayment notice from Social Security...

  • medicaid abortion Planned Parenthood death abuse

    56 Lawmakers Ask HHS Probe of Planned Parenthood’s Response to Child Sexual Abuse

    A group of 56 lawmakers led by Rep. Vicky Hartzler, R-Mo., is urging...

  • work social security benefits millions payments

    Here Are 5 New Signs Social Security Is Going Insolvent

    The Social Security Administration released its annual trustees...

  • social security option SSA bend pension benefit benefits trooper

    Social Security for Retired Trooper in Second Career – Ask Rusty

    Dear Rusty:  I am a retired Indiana State Trooper but I’m working at a...

  • California gender pronouns future

    These California Rebels Are Working With Trump, Not Against Him

    The resistance is growing in California. The Golden State has set itself...

  • social security administration portal benefits application disability benefits pension COLA benefit

    Does Turning 65 Change My Social Security Benefit? – Ask Rusty

    Dear Rusty:  I started drawing Social Security at age 62. At that time, I...

Leave a Reply

1 Comment on "The Social Security Trustees Say They Must Dip Into Its Trust Fund For The First Time Since 1982"

  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Rik
Start by seizing ALL THE PERSONAL WEALTH of LBJ’s estate and EVERY DOLLAR STOLEN BY OBAMA. It was these 2 Presidents WHO STOLE FROM THE AMERICAN TAXPAYERS when LBJ stole from Social Security to help pay for HIS Vietnam War and OBAMA took Social Security monies to help fund Obamacare. But worst was JIMMY CARTER who first gave Social Security benefits to Immigrants over 65 who NEVER EVEN PAID INTO THE FUND. Social Security was first put into effect by FDR and was originally designed to be voluntary, now We, the American Taxpayers are forced to pay into it out of our paychecks our entire working lives to “fund” our retirements, and NOW IT’S BROKE!!! … Our “wonderful” politicians, not one of which “retires” being less than a millionaire. … I guess if a politician “saves” their entire salary every year they served, they can retire as millionaires! … Who
Copy this html code to your website/blog to embed this press release.

Comments

Post new comment

8 + 0 =

To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.