White House Was Angered by Obama's Peace Prize, Which Still Haunts the Nobel Committee

Reason Foundation's picture
Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly versionPDF versionPDF version

Some committee members accused of being fawning, starstruck.

May 21, 2014

Utenrisk Departementet NorwayUtenrisk Departementet NorwayIn 2009 then White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel reportedly laid into the Norwegian ambassador to the United States, Wegger Christian Strømmen, after it was announced that President Obama was awarded that year's Nobel Peace Prize. Strømmen's colleague, Morten Wetland, says that the White House was angry about the award, which immediately proved controversial. Obama's prize has taken center stage in the debate about re-appointments to the Norwegian Nobel Committee this year.

"Many people thought awarding Obama the Peace Prize was pretty embarrassing," Wetland tells Dagens Næringsliv, a Norwegian business newspaper. Wetland was the Norwegian ambassador to the United Nations at the time of the award. "An American president would like to set his own agenda. In this case he was forced into a role that he did not seek. Besides, it was only one year into his first presidential term. It can seem as if someone did this to get Barack Obama to visit their country."

The former official says that was the most embarrassing day he had on the job as an ambassador to the U.N. "My coworker in Washington got a tongue-lashing from Obama's chief of staff," Wetland says. "Getting yelled at is a big part of an ambassador's job. They [Obama's people] probably went after the first person they could get their hands on, and Emanuel is known for being profane and direct. The word 'fawning' was used."  

As Reason reported at the time, the awarding of the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize was all about Nobel Committee Chairman Thorbjørn Jagland seeking press for his organization by stroking the new American president. His "grand thinking," as commentators put it, was that such an award would be impossible to ignore. In public statements, Jagland made it sound as if the prize was the international community's endorsement of the president's electoral victory.

Wetland's op-ed about Emanuel's conversation with Ambassador Strømmen was spurred by upcoming decisions about the membership of the Nobel Peace Prize Committee. Several of the members of the Nobel Committee are up for re-appointment this fall. There are bound to be changes, as the majority in the Storting, the Norwegian Parliament with the power to select members, changed during the elections last fall. Many are arguing that Jagland should not be re-appointed, and the prize that was given to Obama is among the foremost arguments.

Wetland is among the people arguing that the next round of appointments should include candidates from outside Norway, such as former UN Secretary General Kofi Annan or Carl Bildt, the Swedish Minister for Foreign Affairs and former prime minister with several international diplomatic appointments under his belt. The Committee has never had foreign members before.

Wetland says that most people considered the award as very strange at the time. "We must ensure prevention of the impression that we here in Norway can get 'starstruck' and appreciate fancy state visits. Even if this has not been the case so far, there is cause to be aware of the issue."

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  • sarcasmic||#

    How many people do you have to kill to get a Peace Prize?

    log in or register to reply

  • Restoras||#

    It's not how many that matters most, it's the color of their skin and the region they live in. Oh, and using drones instead soldiers.

    log in or register to reply

  • wareagle||#

    I think you have to kill them after the fact, in order to justify receipt of the prize.

    log in or register to reply

  • ||#

    Ask Yasir Arafat.

    log in or register to reply

  • robc||#

    Mambership?

    log in or register to reply

  • The Late P Brooks||#

    he was forced into a role that he did not seek.

    Does this mean he would have been even more aggressive if this "peace prize" had not hobbled him?

    log in or register to reply

  • DJF||#

    We would have taken Ukraine and been advancing on Volgograd (Stalingrad)

    log in or register to reply

  • ||#

    Besides, it was only one year into his first presidential term.

    That's not only technically incorrect, but also disingenuous. The actual award was announced in October, 9 months into his term. But the nomination deadline for the 2009 prize was February 1st - 11 days after his inauguration. They could just as easily have rationalized giving the award to John McCain based on his losing the election and sparing the world the nuclear holocaust he was obviously going to start.

    log in or register to reply

  • DJF||#

    Plus have him win the Eurovision contest with his number 1 song hit

    "Bomb, Bomb, Bomb, Bomb, Bomb Iran”

    log in or register to reply

  • Rich||#

    Wetland is among the people arguing that the next round of appointments should include candidates from outside Norway

    Right! Fuck the will of Alfred Nobel!

    log in or register to reply

  • Rich||#

    I retract my snark, since I see the appointments must merely be made by the Norwegian Parliament.

    Still, something smells like lutefisk ....

    log in or register to reply

  • Fluffy||#

    So what you're telling me is that when your only asset is the prestige associated with an award you give out, it's not a good idea to give that award to someone who doesn't deserve it?

    SHOCKING

    log in or register to reply

  • Lady Bertrum||#

    Before giving out honors most organizations send out feelers to gauge the recipients attitude towards the honor. Did the Nobel people not unofficially contact Obama's people prior to awarding him?

    There has to have been some communication eff-up somewhere along the line.

    log in or register to reply

  • BilboTeabaggins||#

    Nobody ever suspects the Nobel Committee.

    log in or register to reply

  • wareagle||#

    so Barack's a victim here? Come on. Sorry, but this notion of an enraged Emmanuel years after the prize was given smacks of bullshit.

    log in or register to reply

  • AustinRoth||#

    I call BS for the stated reason Obama got the NPP.

    log in or register to reply

  • BilboTeabaggins||#

    President Not My Fault strikes again!

    log in or register to reply

  • Bardas Phocas||#

    Now the Al Gore prize - HE totally earned that one.
    For the Planet!
    For the Internet!

    ...and to flip a finger to Bush!

    log in or register to reply

Leave a Comment

You must have an account and be logged in to comment.
Click here to register, or here to login if you already have an account
News Source : White House Was Angered by Obama's Peace Prize, Which Still Haunts the Nobel Committee
Copy this html code to your website/blog to embed this press release.